Busqueda de publicaciones de evaluación

Total results: 198.

Discover articles on:

  • Improving evidence-based evaluations in view of the ex post evaluation
  • What do the Green Deal Targets mean for CAP Strategic Plans
  • The 15th Good Practice Workshop: 'Assessing the contribution of RDPs to a competitive and viable agricultural sector'

Expand your knowledge of:

  • Adapting the evaluation design in times of COVID-19: Questions to guide decisions for RDP evaluations

This report summarises the major outcomes of the Good Practice Workshop, ‘Improving data-management and information systems for the purpose of evaluation’, which was hosted by the European Evaluation Helpdesk for Rural Development. 

The 16th Good Practice Workshop of the Evaluation Helpdesk on ‘Improving data-management and information systems for the purpose of evaluation’, took place online on 16-17 March 2021. The overall objective of the workshop was to reflect on innovative experiences in relation to data management and information systems for the purpose of evaluation in the context of the CAP. To this end, the workshop explored EU level projects that deal with data infrastructure, collection and monitoring, seeking to identify their relevance and usefulness for evaluation.

This summary report describes the progress made by the Member States in implementing the RDP evaluation plans as reported in Chapter 2 of the 2020 AIRs. The summary is based on the screening of Chapter 2 of 113 Annual Implementation Reports (AIRs).

This document addresses challenges in preparing and conducting the assessment of RDP impacts in the ex post evaluation with consideration for multiple intervening, confounding or external factors related to a changing socio-economic, environmental or health context (as recently experienced) which may influence the intended programme effects.

This document provides a non-exhaustive list of possible additional evaluation elements (judgement criteria, result indicators, possible data sources) and a list of actions that Managing Authorities and evaluators may consider when preparing and conducting the assessment of competitiveness in the ex post evaluation when answering Common Evaluation Questions 4 and 6. 

This document includes the updated fiches for answering Common Evaluation Questions 4 and 6 for the ex post evaluation of RDPs 2014-2020. These fiches have been updated by providing a non-exhaustive list of possible additional evaluation elements that Managing Authorities and evaluators may consider when preparing and conducting the assessment of competitiveness in agriculture. 

The purpose of this thematic evaluation was to achieve a better assessment of C.40 and I.11 or gross nutrient balance (GNB) on agricultural land. In the case of Hungary, national balance levels often mask the share of extreme positive and negative dissolved nitrogen (DN) and dissolved phosphorus (DP) data, both of which may cause environmental risks.

This working document compiles a selection of evaluation-related queries raised by the Member States between 2016 and March 2021. Answers were prepared by the European Evaluation Helpdesk for Rural Development in collaboration with the responsible Commission services.  

This Working Document has been initiated on the basis of the existing glossary annexed to the European Commission – Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development (2017) Technical Handbook on the Monitoring and Evaluation Framework of the Common Agricultural Policy 2014 – 2020, hereafter referred as ‘DG AGRI (2017) Technical Handbook for the CMEF 2014-2020’. Moreover, it contains key terms related to evaluation developed by, or used during the European Evaluation Helpdesk’s Thematic Working Groups (TWGs).  

Pages