Search Evaluation Publications

Total results: 153.

Discover articles on:

  • Assessing RDP effects on achieving balanced territorial development of rural economies and communities
  • New technologies for monitoring agricultural activity: New IACs Vision in action (NIVA) project
  • Estimating impacts of EU RDP support through a regional quasi-experimental approach

Expand your knowledge of:

  • The Farm Accountancy Data Network

This report summarises the major outcomes of the Good Practice Workshop, 'Approaches to Assess Environmental RDP Impacts in 2019', which was hosted by the European Evaluation Helpdesk for Rural Development. 

The workshop aimed at showing and discussing practical examples of evaluation approaches for assessing the environmental related CAP Pillar II impact indicators and for answering the related Common Evaluation Questions (CEQ) in 2019.

This report summarises the major outcomes of the Good Practice Workshop, 'Approaches to Assess Socio-economic and Sector Related RDP Impacts in 2019', which was co-hosted by the European Evaluation Helpdesk for Rural Development and Polish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. 

The workshop aimed at showing and discussing practical examples of evaluation approaches for assessing the socio-economic and sector related CAP Pillar II impact indicators and for answering the related Common Evaluation Questions (CEQ) in 2019.

 

TWG5

These non-binding Guidelines aim to examine the challenges in relation to the evaluation activities for the AIR in 2019 by:

  • Presenting practical approaches to estimate the RDP’s net contributions to the common CAP impact indicators and assess the progress in achieving the EU level objectives; 
  • Providing support for answering the common evaluation questions (CEQs) 22-30 and for reporting on evaluation findings to the European Commission in the AIRs submitted in 2019.

The Guidelines are structured in four parts (presented in three documents):

  • PART I (primarily for Managing Authorities): informs about the legal requirements and outlines how to report in 2019 on the CEQs 22-30. Part I contains references to other existing guidance. 
  • PART II (primarily for evaluators): offers methodological support for assessing the common impact indicators of Pilar II (sectoral, environmental and socio-economic impacts). This part explains each intervention logic, the use of additional evaluation elements, explains the data requirements, the units of assessment and guides the reader through choosing the most appropriate evaluation approaches for netting out the RDP’s contributions to the values of the CAP impact indicators. Furthermore, Part II also suggests approaches to assess RDP contributions towards achieving the EU 2020 strategy and innovation. 
  • PART III: contains the fiches for answering the CEQs 22–30.
  • PART IV: contains the technical annex including more detailed information on the approaches to assess the CAP impact indicators and the glossary of terms.

This factsheet focuses on the approach and methodologies used in the evaluation support study published by the European Commission on the impact of the CAP on habitats, landscapes, and biodiversity. 

This factsheet focuses on the assessment of RDP impacts on soil organic carbon content and erosion in the Czech Republic.

This is report is an evaluation of the Lithuanian Rural Development 2014-2020. The analysis of this report focuses on the impact of the programme on the environment and identification of environmental indicators between 2016–2018

Preliminary study for evaluation of environmental investments for improved water quality in the rural program and investment support for aquaculture in the marine and fisheries program
The evaluation aims to demonstrate the methods that can be used to analyse the effects of program efforts on the presence of phosphorus and nitrogen. The main purpose is to clarify how to evaluate selected initiatives, what documentation is required and what methods can be used.
 

Pages